These pages will help you design or redesign modules so that your students are encouraged to develop the ability to identify, analyse and challenge the assumptions, their own and those of others, that contextualise and situate knowledge. In other words, help you to ensure that the design of your modules encourages rather than discourages the development of criticality in your students. Teaching in higher education is about developing such criticality.
In a research intensive university such as UCD, it is also important that the critical thinking skills we inculcate in our students include those that enable some of them, at least, to become leaders of research in the future.
Research into teaching and learning has identified four factors related to module design that tend to encourage the development of criticality and four factors that tend to discourage it. To read more about these factors, click here.
When designing a module, the three key points that you need to keep in mind are:
A review of a module might start by evaluating how well the existing design matches up to the principles shown above. You will also want to gather data on how your students have experienced the module and take advantage of any insights they may be able to give you. For this reason we have included some advice on how to gather feedback from students.
It can also be enlightening to have colleagues advise you on how you might develop the teaching and learning strategies used in the module. For this reason, we have included links to our peer-observation of teaching web-pages which show you one very effective way of gathering useful feedback from colleagues.
You might also be interested in our web-pages giving details of the UCD module enhancement project which took place in 2009.
Attempts at module enhancement should be focused on understanding:
The goal is to understand what is working well and what might need some adjustment in order to facilitate more effective learning for future offerings of the module. Module enhancement is a responsive and reflective activity based on the assumption that there are many variables at play which have an influence on how a module runs. These can include, indicatively, variables like:
As a module coordinator you are entrusted with responsibility for ensuring the on-going quality and relevance of some of your school’s modules. In taking an enhancement approach to the delivery of your modules, you could use the following questions to take a “step back” to review how well a module is achieving its aims:
a. In your view what aspects of this module worked really well? Why did they work well?
b. What aspects of this module could be enhanced for the future? How might these be achieved?
c. How well do the learning outcomes you have designed, express clearly what it is you expect students to learn in terms of the range of material? How clear is the level of academic understanding you expect the students to reach?
d. How well does the design of the student workload support the intended learning outcomes of the module in terms of: contact time; range and timing of assessments?
e. What does the pattern of student grades for your module suggest in terms of how well students are achieving the learning outcomes you have set?
f. How well do you think your assessments help students’ learning and test their understanding of the material covered?
g. What does student feedback reveal about their experience of the module?
In all matters to do with design and assessment of modules please be sure to be familiar with the UCD General Regulations.
The specially prepared guides for the Module Enhancement Project may also be of use.