A comparative analysis in ophthalmology - Google DeepMind’s gemini AI versus ChatGPT

Congratulations to UCD School of Medicine's final year student Mouayad Masalkhi, UCD Medicine alumnus Dr Ethan Waisberg, and all involved in the paper published in nature.com 'Google DeepMind's gemini AI versus ChatGPT: a comparative analysis in ophthalmology'.

Google’s Gemini AI represents a significant leap in chatbot technology, showcasing advanced capabilities and innovative features. Central to Gemini’s design is its status as a “native multimodal” model, enabling it to process and learn from various data types, including text, audio, and video. Gemini’s technical capabilities is evident in its ability to analyse complex data sets, such as charts and images, which is a substantial advancement over the earlier Bard AI models. This capability is particularly relevant for applications in medicine and ophthalmology, where data often comes in visual formats like medical images/scans. By analysing these images, Gemini could potentially be a useful tool to healthcare professionals in diagnosing and treating a wide range of conditions.

Moreover, Gemini’s potential in medicine extends beyond image analysis. Its advanced language processing abilities enable it to understand and interpret medical literature, patient histories, and research data, providing valuable insights for medical professionals. In ophthalmology, Gemini could assist in diagnosing eye conditions, analysing patient-reported symptoms, and even suggesting treatment plans based on the latest research and clinical guidelines. ChatGPT has previously attempted these tasks, however did not yet perform at suitable levels to be used clinically. Large language models such as ChatGPT can make errors in understanding the context of information, or provide outdated information, which further complicates the usage of these technologies in a clinical context.

The team worked through a series of tests using both Gemini AI and ChatGPT/GPT-4.

Overall, the new Gemini AI model represents a notable improvement in text-based output than predecessor models. The comparative analysis between Gemini AI and ChatGPT/GPT-4 reveals distinct attributes and capabilities of these advanced AI models. Gemini AI shows promise with unique strengths in areas such as language understanding. It emerges as a strong competitor to ChatGPT, suggesting a dynamic and evolving landscape in AI language models. Both models exhibit exceptional capabilities but differ in various aspects of language processing and response generation. The analysis underlines the fact that each AI model, including ChatGPT, GPT-4, Bard, and Gemini AI, possesses unique strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different applications and use cases. It is important to note that further advancements are necessary prior to being the use of AI chatbots in clinical settings.

For a full explanation of the Method, see the paper here.