News and Events

Prof. FAUSTO FRAISOPI (University of Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany)

LECTURE

The Task of Reason in 21th Century

Tuesday 2 April 2024

18h – 19h30

Agnes Cuming Seminar Room

School of Philosophy

SEMINARS

The three seminars will be oriented, in a more technical way, to conceptually outline and define the structures of this form of first philosophy in relation to complexity of reality and in a closer convergence with themes of analytic philosophy such as a structural theory of science, meta-ontology and meta-metaphysics.

Phenomenology, Meta-theory and Mathesis Universalis

Wednesday 3 April 2024

17h30 – 19h30

Newman Building

Room E 115

In the first seminar, we will question the possibility of a mathesis universalis as metatheory, as the original project of phenomenology. In a first part, the evolution of the concept of mathesis universalis (and of metatheory of science) within phenomenology, both Husserlian and post-Husserlian, will be expounded in order to highlight its essential link with the concept of Lifeworld defined in the lecture. From this definition we will move on to question the possibility 1) of still thinking of phenomenology as mathesis and 2) of actualising this concept, i.e. the idea of a metatheory of science in the light of the progress of philosophical and scientific knowledge in the last century. This will lead us to define an entirely different concept of mathesis and metatheory from that defined by Husserl as the initial project of phenomenology itself. From this point of view, the concept of metatheory will be related to the problem of metaphysics and to that of the need for a metaphysical foundation of the unity of sciences.

Phenomenology and Meta-ontology

Thursday 4 April 2024

14h – 16h

Agnes Cuming Seminar Room

School of Philosophy

In order to define the concept of meta-ontology, we will start from the phenomenological concept of regional ontologies, the early Heideggerian definition of meta-ontology (cf. ’28), and the concept defined by Quine of ontological relativity. The convergence of the frameworks that will emerge from this analysis will allow us to relate the concept of relativity of ontology and the concept of the historicity of ontologies with a broadened perspective capable of  integrating the process of evolution and interaction of ontologies with the idea of a meta-ontological model. In the second part of the course, we will focus on the idea of a general grammar for thinking about the interaction and transformation of ontologies in relation to their historicity and in relation to their plurality.

Complexity and Meta-metaphysics

Friday 5 April 2024

15h – 17h

Agnes Cuming Seminar Room

School of Philosophy

In the third seminar, the fundamental concepts defined in the previous sessions, namely that of a plastic multidimensionality of the life-world, that of an open meta-theory and that of a descriptive meta-ontology, will be related to the challenge of rationality in understanding the complexity of the world. In the first part we will outline the figures and conceptual elements needed to think from the perspective of history and philosophy of science, above all to measure and conceptually define the distance between the original formulation of a project of rationality (such as that of phenomenology) and its current horizon. In a second step we will proceed to define the structures that determine the nature of a philosophy first beyond metaphysics. To do this we will enter into the contemporary debate, in the analytical field, of meta-metaphysics in order to relate it to the concept of overcoming metaphysics. From this convergence we will proceed to outline the idea of a speculative thought, a “mathesis of instabilities” or “complexities”, beyond the metaphysical foundation of knowledge on an ultimate or fundamental ontology.

(opens in a new window)

Trust in experts and expertise

PERITIA, a Europe-wide project led by UCD, sought to understand the pressing issue of trust in scientific expertise. The team communicated their findings widely, including via publications, parliamentary presentations, podcasts and an online Trust Toolkit. 
Professor Maria Baghramian

Available 28th November - Pre-Order here: (opens in a new window)Testimonial Injustice and Trust

Editors: Maria Baghramian and Melanie Altanian

Description

This book presents novel approaches and perspectives to scholarship on epistemic injustice and particularly, testimonial injustice and their connections with public trust.

Drawing from different philosophical schools of thought and approaches, the book provides a comprehensive analysis of the conditions, mechanisms and normative implications of testimonial injustice, a term most prominently introduced by Fricker (2007), and the role that trust can play in fostering testimonial justice. Through the application of theories of epistemic injustice, and testimonial injustice, to new contexts and cases, including gendered violence, disability, indigenous knowledge, genocide, vaccine hesitancy and the COVID-19 pandemic, the book sheds light on the real-world significance of these philosophical concepts.

Testimonial Injustice and Trustintroduces new directions for further research and will appeal to scholars and students in (critical) social and political epistemology, normative ethics as well as social and political philosophy more generally. The chapters in this book were originally published in theInternational Journal of Philosophical Studies, Social EpistemologyandEducational Philosophy and Theory.

We are so proud of the contribution of our colleague Dr Lisa Foran and really pleased to see The Belonging Project on display in the UCD Student Village. This exhibition of UCD students and staff's written and creative expressions of belonging will be in place for the remainder of 2023. (opens in a new window)#DontMissIt (opens in a new window)http://belonging.ie

Professor Dan Deasy of UCD School of Philosophy has been taking philosophy and in particular critical thinking to the national stage with a piece in the Irish Times and interviews with RTE and Newstalk.

(opens in a new window)https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2023/10/16/why-do-we-comment-on-things-we-know-nothing-about/

(opens in a new window)https://www.rte.ie/radio/radio1/clips/22309575/

(opens in a new window)https://www.newstalk.com/podcasts/highlights-from-newstalk-breakfast/talking-bs-is-it-dangerous

The overall winner of this year's Irish and International Young Philosopher Awards 2023 is Seán Radcliffe with a project entitled: ‘Has Plato’s Allegory of the Cave Been Warning Us of Social Media for 2500 Years?’. Seán is from Gonzaga College SJ, 5th Year.