PHIL30700 Pragmatism

Academic Year 2018/2019

Pragmatism originated in the late 19th-century writings of two of America’s most talented philosophers and scientists, Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914) and William James (1842–1910). It continued to develop as an outlook on meaning and practice across the 20th century to today. Peirce's ‘pragmatic maxim’ was a method or test for clarifying the meaning of a concept in terms of the practical effects the adoption of that concept would have in the long run of experience. James broadened Peirce’s pragmatic method to include the effects of beliefs on believers themselves, thereby putting human beings’ most deep-seated faiths and sceptical attitudes to the test of experience. Together with John Dewey (1859–1952), the three ‘classical pragmatists’ and their 20th century successors (all collected together in _The Pragmatist Reader: from Peirce through the Present_, ed. Talisse and Aikin, Princeton 2011) challenged the traditional foundationalist conceptions of knowledge shared by both empiricists and rationalists. Pragmatists modeled inquiry, rather, on the fallibilist methods of experimental science, Darwinian evolution, and cultural change, including metaphysical and political ideas within the ambit of ‘experience’ broadly conceived. Given the open-ended nature of pragmatism it is not surprising that a wide-variety of approaches have fallen under that umbrella, from technical philosophy of language to radical democratic social critiques. This module will provide an analysis and survey of pragmatism from its classical and mid-century roots to its most recent expressions in Robert Brandom, Susan Haack, Cheryl Misak, and other thinkers.

Show/hide contentOpenClose All

Curricular information is subject to change

Learning Outcomes:

Having completed this module students should be able to articulate the central claims and strategies in the pragmatist tradition both past and present. Students will be able to understand and think creatively about central notions in epistemology, metaphysics, the theory of meaning, and theories of truth and reality, in particular in the 20th century pragmatist and analytic traditions in American philosophy. Another important learning outcome will be further developing one's ability to structure an argumentative essay in philosophy clearly and forcefully, along with improving one's ability to produce good analytical, argument-based written work in general.

Student Effort Hours: 
Student Effort Type Hours
Lectures

24

Tutorial

8

Autonomous Student Learning

93

Total

125

 
Requirements, Exclusions and Recommendations
Learning Recommendations:

It is strongly recommended that the student have passed at least four level two modules before taking this module.



 
Description % of Final Grade Timing
Examination: Final exam, end of semester

50

2 hour End of Trimester Exam
Essay: 3000 word essay

30

Varies over the Trimester
Continuous Assessment: Assignments, participation.

20

Varies over the Trimester

Compensation

This module is not passable by compensation

Resit Opportunities

End of Semester Exam

Remediation

If you fail this module you may repeat, resit or substitute where permissible. The resit will consist of a 2-hour end of semester exam in the subsequent semester.

Name Role
Robert Smith Tutor